Why Bloodborne Misses the Mark for Me

Why Bloodborne Misses the Mark for Me
Bloodborne, developed by FromSoftware, is often hailed as a masterpiece in the Soulsborne genre. Its Gothic atmosphere, challenging combat, and intricate lore have captivated countless players. However, despite its critical acclaim, the game didn’t resonate with me as it did with others. In this post, I’ll explore why Bloodborne falls short for me, focusing on its pacing, difficulty curve, and storytelling approach.
Pacing Issues in Bloodborne

One of the main reasons Bloodborne misses the mark for me is its pacing. The game’s relentless intensity leaves little room for breathing. Unlike Dark Souls, which offers moments of exploration and reflection, Bloodborne demands constant aggression. While this aligns with its “hunt or be hunted” theme, it can feel exhausting after prolonged gameplay sessions.
📌 Note: The fast-paced combat may appeal to some, but it can alienate players who prefer a more methodical approach.
The Lack of Downtime
The game’s design encourages quick decision-making, which can be thrilling but also overwhelming. There’s little opportunity to pause and strategize, especially in boss fights. This lack of downtime can make the experience feel more like a chore than an adventure.
A Steep Difficulty Curve

Bloodborne is notorious for its difficulty, a hallmark of FromSoftware games. However, the challenge often feels artificial rather than rewarding. Enemies deal massive damage, and the limited healing options add unnecessary frustration.
Unforgiving Combat Mechanics
The game’s emphasis on aggression means that defensive playstyles are heavily penalized. While the rally system (regaining health by attacking) is innovative, it forces players into a single style of play. This lack of flexibility can be a major turn-off for those who enjoy experimenting with different strategies.
📌 Note: The difficulty curve may deter casual players, limiting the game’s accessibility.
Storytelling That Feels Inaccessible

Bloodborne’s storytelling is often praised for its depth, but it’s delivered in a way that feels overly cryptic. The lore is scattered across item descriptions, NPC dialogue, and environmental clues, requiring players to piece it together themselves.
The Challenge of Deciphering Lore
While some enjoy the mystery, I found it frustrating. The lack of clear narrative guidance made it difficult to stay invested in the story. Compared to games like The Witcher 3, where the story is more straightforward, Bloodborne’s approach felt like a barrier rather than an invitation.
Final Thoughts

Bloodborne is undeniably a well-crafted game with a dedicated fanbase. However, its pacing, difficulty, and storytelling didn’t align with my preferences. If you’re someone who enjoys fast-paced combat, cryptic lore, and a steep challenge, Bloodborne might be perfect for you. For me, though, it missed the mark.
Is Bloodborne worth playing if I’m not a fan of difficult games?
+Bloodborne’s difficulty is a core part of its design. If you’re not a fan of challenging games, you may find it frustrating rather than rewarding.
Can I enjoy Bloodborne if I don’t like fast-paced combat?
+The game heavily emphasizes aggressive play, so if you prefer a slower, more defensive style, Bloodborne may not suit your preferences.
Is Bloodborne’s story easy to follow?
+The story is intentionally cryptic and requires significant effort to piece together. If you prefer a more straightforward narrative, you may find it frustrating.
Related Keywords: Bloodborne gameplay, Bloodborne difficulty, Bloodborne storytelling, Soulsborne genre, FromSoftware games